Full text
Official document · full textBulletinMO DCI Bulletin 16-03
16-03 – Request for Comment - Premium Stabilization, Feb. 2, 2016
Version history
v1fetched Jul 19, 2026082bed858b98
¶1
INSURANCE BULLETIN 16-03
Request for Comment – Premium Stabilization
Issued: February 2, 2016
The following Bulletin is issued by the Missouri Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions and
Professional Registration (“Department”) to inform and educate the reader on the specified issue. It
does not have the force and effect of law, is not an evaluation of any specific facts or circumstances,
and is not binding on the Department or an insurer. See §374.015, RSMo.
¶2
To: All insurers writing property and casualty insurance in the State of Missouri,
producers and any other interested stakeholders
From: John M. Huff, Director
Re: Request for Comment – Premium Stabilization
¶3
The Department is considering promulgating rules regarding the use of premium stabilization
rules or practices by property and casualty insurers. Premium stabilization is generally
understood to be a practice intended to moderate a significant premium change on a segment or
block of business. Premium stabilization is a temporary or limited duration practice and does not
replace traditional underwriting and rating methodologies, which are based on actuarial standards
and practices.
¶4
Premium stabilization is generally used in two circumstances. The first circumstance is when
significant changes to the insurer’s base rates may result in large premium changes (increases or
decreases) to policyholders. An insurer will utilize premium stabilization to phase in an
indicated or needed rate change to avoid policyholder rate volatility. The second circumstance is
when an insurer significantly modifies its rating systems or when an insurer merges or acquires
business from a different insurer (either within the same group of affiliated companies or outside
of the group). In this instance, the company may utilize what are referred to as “transitional
rules” to effectively accomplish the same moderation of premium changes. 1
¶5
Previously, the Department had issued Bulletin 11-02, “Personal lines premium stabilization of
renewal policies”. Bulletin 11-02 expired on December 31, 2012 and was formally rescinded on
January 12, 2015.
¶6
The Department is considering the regulatory issues and concerns related to premium
stabilization practices. The Department is issuing this Bulletin specifically to solicit public
comment, gather additional information and determine how best to proceed.
¶7
Interested parties are asked to submit comments regarding the use of premium stabilization
practices in the State of Missouri no later than March 17, 2016. Comments should be
submitted to: marketregulation@insurance.mo.gov .
¶8
The Department is specifically seeking comment on the following key issues:
¶9
The definition of premium stabilization practices;
The extent to which premium stabilization practices comply with Missouri rating laws that
generally provide that rates shall not be “excessive, inadequate or unfairly
discriminatory”;
The circumstances under which premium stabilization practices are appropriate and
permissible, if any;
The circumstances under which premium stabilization practices are not appropriate, if
any;
Those lines of insurance to which premium stabilization practices should be permitted;
The appropriate duration of premium stabilization practices (e.g., by renewal cycle);
Any limitations on the practice of premium stabilization (e.g., percentage limitations);
The extent to which different consideration should be given to the two types of premium
stabilization practices described herein – large internal rate changes versus the acquisition
of new blocks of business;
The extent to which it should be permissible for insurers to modify premiums for a
policyholder, i.e., to minimize the rate change a policyholder experiences they are
switched from one insurer to another through a merger, acquisition or inter-affiliate
transfer;
Whether multiple premium stabilization practices should be permitted to be applied
(simultaneously or subsequently) within the same book of business;
¶10
1
Paraphrased from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), Casualty Actuarial and Statistical
Task Force (CASTF) Price Optimization White Paper. NAIC CASTF White Paper
Filing requirements and supporting documentation for the transparent disclosure of
premium stabilization practices within rate filings submitted to the Department;
Filing requirements for corresponding rules detailing premium stabilization practices and
methodologies;
Filing requirements regarding the detailed implementation of any planned premium
stabilization practices;
The extent to which information may be trade secret or proprietary;
Whether there should be any notice requirements to policyholders regarding future
premium changes resulting from premium stabilization.
¶11
Subsequent to the written comment period, the Department will hold a public hearing to discuss
all comments received and to allow further comment and discussion from interested parties.
¶12
For those wanting additional information or clarification regarding this Request for Comment
may contact Angela Nelson at 573-751-2430 or via email at angela.nelson@insurance.mo.gov.
¶13
####